|
***********
Our Homeport Page also contains the initial editions of
the Association's War on Terror, National Security Affairs and Veterans Issues Newstands.
***************
![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]()
Naval Power is the cornerstone of the defense of the Nation.
UNITED STATES NAVY
VETERANS ASSOCIATION
as a Partner in
VA's Approved Veterans Service Organization Program Washington
D.C. National Headquarters Telephone (202) 736-1725 the very
first articles of Information on the Demographics of Our Viewers; (with even more hyperlinks on our Links Page); ATTACKED THE U.S. PACIFIC FLEET AT PEARL HARBOR. THE SHIPS
BOMBED AT PEARL THAT MORNING, FROM THEIR POSITIONS WEST TO EAST, CLOCKWISE AROUND FORD ISLAND, WERE: the MEDUSA, the CURTISS,
the TANGIER, the UTAH, the RALEIGH, the DETROIT, the DOBBIN, the WHITNEY, the NEVADA, the ARIZONA, the VESTAL, the TENNESSEE,
the WEST VIRGINIA, the MARYLAND, (the Maryland and West Virginia were "Colorado" class battleships) the OKLAHOMA, the NEOSHO,
the CALIFORNIA, the NEW ORLEANS, and the SAN FRANCISCO. 1,200 men went down on the U.S.S. ARIZONA (BB39) alone. The sunken ARIZONA is still discharging oil today, "tears"
as we say in the Navy. The story goes that the tears will stop when the last survivor of the ARIZONA is laid to rest. (This Page features The Star Spangled Banner as background music.) "Mine Eyes have Seen the Glory" WAC
World War II Poster went on to
become a leader in the Women's Suffrage Movement. She died in 1910. Upon the surrender of the South in 1865,
President Lincoln ordered the White House Band to play 'Dixie.' "It is one of the best tunes I have ever heard," he said. There's a yellow rose of Texas I'm going for to see,
No other soldier knows her, nobody only me. She cried so when I left her, it like to broke my heart, and if I ever find her,
we never more will part. Where the Rio Grande is flowing and starry skies are
bright, She walks along the river in the quiet summer night. She thinks if I remember we parted long ago; I promised to come
back again and never let her go. "The Yellow Rose of Texas" is not a flower, but a person,
Emily D. West, who was indentured to Colonel James Morgan, who fought in Texas' war for independence against Mexico. Many are the hearts that are weary tonight, wishing for the war to cease;
many are the hearts that are looking for the right, To see the dawn of peace. Tenting tonight, tenting tonight, tenting on the old camp ground__ Tenting tonight, tenting tonight, tenting on the old camp ground. "Tenting on the Old Camp Ground" was composed during the Civil War, and
this poignant song remained popular long afterward, especially in wartime. It was a particular favorite of Buffalo Bill Cody.
Each carrier group has 50 strike aircraft. Another frequently asked question we get ,is: How many men and women normally serve today on board a USN aircraft
carrier? About 8,000, slightly short of an average U.S. Army or U.S.M.C. infantry division. The real USG deficit for FYE 9/30/2003 was approximately $400 billion. President George W. Bush's proposed 2007 Budget is $354 billion. The National Debt hit $9 trillion in 2006. 40% of it is held by foreigners. $9 trillion consitutes
70% of the United States' Gross Domestic Product (GDP). One simple act by Congress, approved by the President, would end the 2002 U.S. stock market jitters; end talk
of whom we need to jail and whom we don't; bring equity back to American capitalism; and send us on the road to a new stock
market boom: No executive compensation, per person, including everything, over $1 million per year, shall be deductible as
a business expense by a publicly listed corporation, including ADRs and foreign corporate parents with U.S. subsidiaries. That act would also raise billions in new dollars for the U.S. Treasury. ****************** **************** Simply put, the American Nation, any nation, is built on land. But that same nation needs its
seas to defend itself. **************** Query: How many Arabic speakers did Special Envoy to Iraq Paul Bremer have on his Staff? As of 7/03, twelve. "On earth, petroleum once turned petty thugs into world leaders." - From the Star
Trek movie "Insurrection" Crown Prince Abdullah of Saudi Arabia [Ed. Note: The World bank, on July 15,2002, decreed that 80%
of the real Congolese government's $12 billion foreign debt be wiped out. That's quite a "line your pockets" benefit for a
dictatorially-run, corrupt, and mythical government, in our view.] Also heard on "West Wing" 2-19-03, the President of the United States
"President Josiah Bartlet" speaking of the French President who was
opposing U.S. unilateral military intervention in a third world country:" Tell that poncy poof President Jacques Chirac if he doesn't get out of our way, I'll
come over there and stick a loaf of bread up his ass!" It's bad enough, in the opinion of this Association, that we outsource
some of our most valuable jobs . We shouldn't also outsource our national security to the likes of those same foreigners,
or to the likes of Jacques Chirac. The Presidents of France have lived in the Elysee Palace
in Paris since 1873. It's the same place that Madame de Pompadour entertained her lovers, that was turned into a dance
hall during the Revolution of 1789; it was the place where Napoleon signed his abdication after Waterloo, and where Wellington's
British troops quartered themselves, with their boots on the table, so it was said. All those humiliations bothered DeGaulle. They bother
Chirac. It's said it bothers all of them. They should just move to the Sun King's palace at Versailles where, in our opinion,
they'd all feel quite at home with their 'L'etat, c'est moi!' complexes. 20% of the population of France is now foreign-emigrated Muslims, most of them radical,
vicious, terroristic anti-Semites and anti-Americans. These people were permitted to become part of the French nation by France's
immigration laws. French politicians now have to reap this whirlwind. In the process of that reaping, the USG and Americans
should not look for the Elysee Palace to have an epiphany anytime soon and become pro-American. TV and movie star Lisa Kudrow says of France on the 'Tonight Show,' 9/23/03:
"Half the people there are unemployed. Then they go on strike because they're not getting enough money! It's almost impossible
to fire anyone. If you ask for service in a restaurant, they say, 'I'm trying to eat, what do you want?' Then they accuse
you of being the ugly American." She should know. Kudrow is married to a Frenchman, for the time being at
least. Why any American policymaker would propose seeking approval for our
foreign policy of these French, these self-proclaimed heads of the international house of pancakes known as the U.N., this
Association has no idea, and will continue to have no idea. As with Korea in 1950, as with Iraq under Saddam, as with Afghanistan under
the Taliban, as with the anti-American Muslim government of the Sudan in 2004, in its genocide against black Christian Sudanese
in the south of the country, the U.N. has shown itself next to worthless without U.S. financing, and U.S. military force. We will, however, to be evenhanded, say something nice about France, because
the French are not our natural enemies. Quite the reverse, we are natural allies, and have been since the time of the Revolution
and since then, two democracies united for the cause of Liberty in the world. In July, 2004, the government and people of France sponsored and paid for
the greatest and most dramatic bicycle race in the world since 1903, the Tour de France. That July, as an American, a recovered cancer patient from Texas, Lance Armstrong, was poised to win that race triumphantly for an unprecedented 6th time, Americans
could be seen running beside him in the Pyrenees, waving huge American flags, unmolested by the crowds of Frenchmen. If this had been a dictatorship somewhere in the Islamic world, there would
have been no such race, or the American team would have been kidnapped or shot, and the patriots running with the flags, well,
they would have been murdered on the spot. That is the difference between us and them. That is the fundamental difference between a free society, and one based
on intimidation and fear. Let Freedom Ring, and let those opposed to it tremble as mUch as they would
like us to tremble. Let that be our foreign policy. John Amos for CNO? Why not? We've seen worse. [John, who's a great and
unassuming guy, and goes back a long way on TV, plays the CNO on "West Wing" (as of 5-02), the only CJCS featured at the fictional
White House security council. In one episode he says of Islamic terrorists: " We're talking about animals who blow up pregnant
women and children, and you're talking to me about international law...hell, the laws of nature don't even apply to these
people." Can't say the producers don't like the Navy.] [UPDATE 10-23-03: Unfortunately the producers of the West Wing read the
above note and, listening to complaints from the Army, on the 10-8-03 show, introduced an Army Chief of Staff at the
White House NSC for the first time. John Amos, we understand, has gone on to host his own, and separate, TV show.] President Bartlet of the West Wing (Broadcast 4-9-03),
by the way, is wrong in one of his speeches: America's Destiny is of our choosing. No nation,
no people, no group of nations on earth, dictate our destiny to us. Providence might, but none of the above will. ***************************** To us here at the United States Navy Veterans Association, it does not matter whether your mother came here on the Mayflower,
or on a slave ship from Africa. We're all in the same boat now. by Diane Warren This Association also believes that no one is going to bend or break the United States, and
that we, too, have faith into the heart as to our purposes. Space, to a naval veteran, is simply another form of sea upon
which America must sail. "If you want to explore alien cultures, you need to respect
their laws." That's b.s. Most of the laws of most of the countries on this planet, as they're currently enforced, discriminate
totally against the rights of the individual as contained in the American Bill of Rights, and also against American values.
While American travelers to these countries may be forced by those wearing the guns to obey these laws, there's no need for
any American to "respect" them. The TV show Star Trek Enterprise was cancelled on May 15, 2005
and it may be a long while before Americans see the lkes of it again on television as a new series. Live long and prosper, Star Trek. Live long and prosper, Enterprise. ****************** There is a tendency among certain policy thinkers to believe
the world is united against the United States. This is not true. But many of those foreigners, it is true, are driven purely
by their own unilateral, and jealous, hatreds of the United States, in formulating their own foreign policies. Our foreign policy, and America's future, cannot be placed
in the hands of foreign unilateralists just because they outnumber us in some international house of pancakes. Our national
security must mean more than just counting votes in the U.N. and then deciding what or what not to do accordingly. Great nations do not let others determine their future. Jay: "The equestrian events at the Olympics involve what kind
of animal?" One L.A. man: "Lions." One L.A. woman: "Dolphins." Jay: (Asked two weeks before the games began) "Where will
the 2004 Olympics be held?" Jay: "Athens, where?" The woman: "Athens, Georgia." Jay: "Who invented the airplane?" One woman: "Uhh...Boeing." Another Melrose, California woman: "Uhh...the Cartwright brothers." Jay: "Who invented the lightbulb?" One lady: "Uhh...Albert Einstein." Jay: "When was television invented?" One woman: "Uhh...18...uh...59." Jay: "Who invented the telephone?" One Melrose, California woman: "Uh...AT&T." Jay (Showing a picture of Washington in uniform crossing the Delaware with his men) "What is this a picture of?" A second grade Oregon schoolteacher: "The Jews...uh...leaving in boats?" And heard on WB-TV's Blue Collar TV on 9/16/2004: "The definition of 'European': Two rednecks talking in the woods, one to the other: 'Move a little away, yur a pee-in on my boots." Our United States Navy Veterans Association Staff recognized
the honor former Conservative Prime Minister Brian Mulroney of Canada paid to America in appearing at our National Memorial
Day Ceremony in Washington for 2003. At that Ceremony we had the honor of waving the British flag
in tribute to our British allies in Iraq. It's too bad we could not also have waved the other two flags of our own continent,
Canada's and Mexico's, but so be it. The choice was theirs.... Que sera, sera. **********************
A History and Commentary This Association, which shortly began to informally call itself the Naval Air
Veterans Group, because of the dominance of its primary member organization, the Pensacola Navy Airmen, first became
active by controversially promoting the drive for naval air power and the construction of aircraft carriers as necessities
for a country facing potential enemies on two oceans. Although the British Royal Navy actually commissioned an aircraft carrier in World
War I, the H.M.S. Argus, in the 1920's prototypical aircraft carriers and some seaplanes
alike in the U.S. were still called "flying boats," and although a seaplane naval air station was established at Pensacola, Florida in 1916, the Association still met stiff opposition to these proposals for true naval air
power based on aircraft carriers from the Department of War, the Department of the Navy and from the isolationist feelings
predominant in the country during the 1920's and early 1930's. It is, in real time, absolutely outrageous to the membership of the Association
that any President of the United States would voluntarily elect to publicly meet and greet any member of the Communist
Politboro rubbish which currently dictates policy in Vietnam, or that the USG would share intelligence with them, or train
their military or naval forces. This outrage is only reinforced by the hypocrisy on our side, at the same time, of lecturing
our allies in the War on Terror on the need for more democracy in their own countries, and the hypocrisy on the Vietnamese
side of providing semi-slave labor there in order to sell cheap consumer goods to the U.S., the very practice Karl Marx
condemned in Das Kapital, "surplus labor," i.e., slave labor at slave wages, saying that that practice was
the one of the primary reasons for his promotion of the communist state. Following through on its initial commitment to strong naval power, the Association
was also extremely effective in its support of President Ronald Reagan's national defense program which successfully culminated
in the bankruptcy of the Soviet Union and, more importantly, its military infrastructure. The elimination of the Soviet threat
to America, along with the defeat of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan in World War II, rank as the greatest U.S. defense achievements
of the 20th Century. But the destruction of Soviet-style communism, by policies so professionally and
successfully crafted by both the Nixon and Reagan Administrations, still has some unfinished business in the world: in Castro's
Cuba (and its spreading semi-allies, as of 2007, in Latin America), in Kim Jong Il's North Korea, in the Politboro's Vietnam,
and, in a totally different socio-political-economic dimension of their own, with regard to the Communist regime in Beijing. The members of this Association also supported the unsuccessful insertion of U.S.
Marines into Lebanon in 1983 as peacekeepers designed to minimize the anti-U.S. Syrian presence there, and the successful
attempt, with U.S. troops and Marines in Operation Urgent Fury later that year, to overthrow the thug prime minister Maurice
Bishop of Grenada, who sought, as Hugo Chavez of Venezuela does in 2007, to take his nation on a violently anti-American and
pro-Fidel Castro course in the western hemisphere. When the going got tough in the struggle for Reagan Administration foreign and
national security policy proposals and activities this Association had supported, unlike some other veterans' organizations,
we did not blink, and we did not waver, in that support. During the Bill Clinton Administration, the overwhelming majority of the
individual membership of the Association opposed as policy, and also, as a function of the Association's public
education on issues of interest to veterans, but not in the function of attempting to influence election politics,
many of the foreign, national security and military policies of the Executive Branch. By and large, the Association did so
becaues it saw those policies, in general, as promoting a vision for the United States where our Nation would have a
weakened sovereignty, and a weakened ability to exercise its own right of self defense . We opposed, and oppose
now, that vision because of the nearly unanimous belief of our members that no great nation can retain its
greatness if it lets others make its national security decisions for it. President Clinton, in an interview with Jim Lehrer of PBS-TV's Newshour with Jim
Lehrer on July 7, 2004, said in fact that our outline of his positions in the preceding paragraph constituted exactly
what his vision for American national security was, and is: "I think that in general I saw my job as the first President whose full term
would be served after the Cold War in a global information society where we were interdependent....I saw my job as to try
to move the world from an unstable condition of independence toward a more integrated cooperative world community. Therefore
my approach was to cooperate wherever possible and to build institutions of cooperation...and to cooperate wherever possible
but to act alone if we had to. [The Association notes, for the record, that its research shows
that the Clinton Administration acted unilaterally in America's self defence only twice during eight years: once, when we
bombed some caves in Afghanistan after the CIA had told the White House it was unlikely that Usama would still be there, and,
second, when we bombed what later turned out to be a pharmaceutical factory in Khartoum.] I think what the [George W.] Bush Administration saw was a world they thought
was full of dangers and problems, the worst of which in their mind was Saddam Hussein, and that they should act alone whenever
they could, and then cooperate when they needed to, and there's a big difference. They got out of the Conference of Nuclear
Test Ban Treaty [sic].... They were opposed to the International Criminal Courts, to strenthening the Biological Weapons Convention.
They bagged the ABM treay to build a missile defense even though we don't know whether it works or not. [Cf. U.S.
Senator John Edwards (Dem. -NC), campaigning for Vice-President in Des Moines, 7/14/2004: It is "needless" [means 'without
need'] for America to "go to war alone."] ...[S]ince we're moving into a completely interdependent global environment, we're
better off building a world...when we're not the only military superpower." President Clinton also went on to suggest that his vision for American foreign
policy was becoming a vision for all future Democratic candidates for President, and we think that there is a good chance
that his analysis on that subject is accurate. Former President Clinton's interview answers constituted quite a mouthful. Bill Clinton was
certainly the greatest 'policy wonk' America has ever had as President, and his discourse, as is usual for him, refects
a great amount of thoughtfully, detailed and artfully worded statements. We think there is one thing he got wrong, though, in addition to being wrong on both the logic
behind the national security policies he promoted, as well as on the policies themselves, and that is his categorization of
the national security policies of the Bush Administration. Our analysis is that, in general, the Bush Administration was
extremely supportive of international cooperation, advocating such measures as adherence to the dictates of the WTO whether
we liked it or not, an expanded NATO, and a strengthened NAFTA. Even after 9/11, the Bush Administration asked
for the support of the international community FIRST, and only when it was not forthcoming, in Iraq, did we act and, even
then, coalitions, albeit small ones, were built. The history of these events is reported accurately, day by day, on
our National Security Affairs and War on Terror Newstands, in archive and chronological fashion so anybody, including former President Clinton,
and others like him who criticize this highly substantive site, can review those events. Even satellites
and CIA SR-71s cannot
see inside Kim Jong Il's nuclear reactors,
nor could they see into Saddam's Palaces. The Association supported the decision to
go to war against Saddam in 2003, and would have even if the decision had been entirely unilateral. Saddam's time to go, as
a State terrorist enemy of the United States, was long overdue, even at the end of the Gulf War. He needed to be made an example
of in the aftermath of 9/11. But U.S. military planning as to what to do in the aftermath of his fall in Iraq lacked political-military
precision, and still does today, literally as you are reading this commentary. So we opposed the decision of the Bush Administration to
limit U.S. Force levels in cleaning up the terrorist mess in Iraq after Saddam's overthrowal. We felt that decision was caused
by the fact U.S. combat arms forces are too few wordwide, and that in turn made us then, and makes us today, vulnerable
as a Nation to foreign terrorism operating abroad. Sources as diverse as U.S. Senators John Kerry (D.- Mass.), John McCain
(R.- Ariz.), Joseph Biden (D.- Del.), Hillary Rodham-Clinton (D.- N.Y.) and Joseph Lieberman (D.- Conn.) took positions similiar
or identical to our policy advocacy at the time. When the going got tough, very tough, in the struggle for the foreign and national
security proposals and activities of the George W. Bush Administration this Association had supported, unlike some other veterans'
organizations, we did not blink, and we did not waver, in that support. A not so famous World War II poster pictures a group of Americans united, standing
in front of our Flag. At the bottom of the poster it says" Victory for the American Way." We see no reason why that does not apply as the goal of the War on Terror as well. So, unlike others, we have not, and do not, alter our tack depending
on the policies of a particular Commander-in- Chief for a weaker America, for appeasement of our enemies, or for a weaker
national defense. The expression with approval former President Clinton raised in his interview of not having America
as the world's only military superpower, the very same spectre also raised by Governor Howard Dean of Vermont in
his 2004 Presidential campaign, is unacceptable to our membership as fundamentally out of sync with traditional views
of patriotism , the idea that America cannot remain great if it allows others, with their own agendas former President
Clinton may trust, but which we do not, to make our national security decisions for us. In maintaining this consistency
as a matter of policy advocacy (and not as an attempt to influence any election), it is not just the Navy we fight for, for
we do not view the other Service Branches as our enemies, but America's national security as a whole. We may be in favor of
a stronger Navy, but we are also at the same time in favor of a stronger Army, Marine Corps, Air Force and Coast Guard. But first of all, before all that, we are Americans. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||